• Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Economy
  • Stock
  • Politics
Income Researchers
EconomyEditor's Pick

A US judge partially blocked Trump’s election integrity order from taking force. Is that legal?

by May 2, 2025
May 2, 2025

Last month, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., blocked key parts of President Donald Trump’s executive order on election integrity – a move that underscores how deeply divided the country remains over what ‘election integrity’ really means..

Though the executive order Trump signed was titled, ‘Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections,’ the Democratic National Party (DNC), which led a group of plaintiffs in challenging the order in federal court, argued that it was an attempt to encroach on elections and disenfranchise voters. 

In the end, both sides won out – sort of, and at least for now.  Here’s what to know about the case in question:

Why did the judge block a portion of the order?

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ultimately left in place three key parts of Trump’s executive order, including a provision requiring states not to count mail-in ballots received after Election Day, in a partial victory for the Trump administration. 

But she sided with Democratic plaintiffs in blocking, for now, both a new proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal voter registration forms and a provision directing election officials to verify the citizenship of would-be voters.

Does she have the authority to do so? 

Unequivocally, yes. That’s exactly the problem modern presidents face when trying to make lasting policy changes through executive orders – a tactic increasingly favored by both Democrats and Republicans.

It’s a risky way to govern for two reasons. The first is that these orders can just as easily be overturned by the next commander-in-chief (as has been on display under the last four administrations). 

They also risk being halted in federal courts, where U.S. judges are explicitly tasked with serving as a check on the president, and are free to pause or halt such orders from taking force, should they determine they are outside the scope of the executive branch’s authorities. 

That also doesn’t mean that district courts need to have the final say on the matter.

Kollar-Kotelly stressed last month that voter registration laws and the ability to regulate elections are set by Congress and by individual states, not the executive branch.

Both states and Congress can pass laws so long as they do not ‘needlessly impose’ an undue burden on voters under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 

But the executive branch, which does not share in these abilities to make and pass election-related laws, is not entitled to the same standard of legal review, according to the judge. 

‘Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States – not the President – with the authority to regulate federal elections,’ Kollar-Kotelly said in her ruling.

Next steps

The Trump administration is, of course, free to appeal the decision to higher courts, should it choose to do so. 

‘President Trump will keep fighting for election integrity, despite Democrat objections that reveal their disdain for commonsense safeguards like verifying citizenship,’ White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in response to the ruling last month.

But its next steps remain unclear. To date, the administration has not appealed the matter, and officials have not said definitively whether they plan to do so.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Top Senate Armed Services Republican says Trump OMB’s budget ‘shreds to the bone’ military capabilities
next post
Trump’s interior chief to unleash Gulf drilling with major rule change

Related Posts

Satellite images reveal North Korea’s mangled naval destroyer...

May 24, 2025

Trump administration plans to overhaul National Security Council,...

May 24, 2025

Trump signs executive orders bolstering nuclear industry, domestic...

May 23, 2025

Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners released in swap with...

May 23, 2025

US and Iran clash over uranium enrichment as...

May 23, 2025

FTC drops Biden-era suit accusing Pepsi of price...

May 23, 2025

SCOOP: House GOP memo highlights Republican wins in...

May 23, 2025

Major Russia-Ukraine prisoner swap is underway, official says

May 23, 2025

‘Half a dozen’ more states to ban soda,...

May 23, 2025

23andMe bankruptcy prompts Cornyn-Grassley-Klobuchar bipartisan bill to protect...

May 22, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Satellite images reveal North Korea’s mangled naval destroyer after failed launch

      May 24, 2025
    • Trump administration plans to overhaul National Security Council, weeks after Waltz’s departure

      May 24, 2025
    • Editor’s Picks: ECB Issues Gold Warning, Uranium Stocks Jump on Trump Executive Orders

      May 23, 2025
    • Josef Schachter: Oil to US$80 by Q4? Plus When to Buy the Dip in Stocks

      May 23, 2025
    • Trump signs executive orders bolstering nuclear industry, domestic uranium mining

      May 23, 2025

    Archives

    • May 2025 (615)
    • April 2025 (227)
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 incomeresearchers.com | All Rights Reserved

    Income Researchers
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Economy
    • Stock
    • Politics

    Read alsox

    Trump world fires back at Politico over report...

    April 25, 2025

    Obama reacts to Biden diagnosis: ‘Nobody has done...

    May 19, 2025

    Trump unveils ‘Golden Dome’ missile shield, blindsides key...

    May 21, 2025